New report says Toronto transit network ‘at risk’ due to lack of funding
A new report comparing Toronto transit to a number of other North American cities suggests that the city’s transit network is “at risk” due to a lack of subsidies and dedicated revenue sources.
The report, authored by transit advocacy group CodeRedTO, compared Toronto’s transit fares, network design, operating budget, and governance structure to seven other cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Montreal, Philadelphia, San Diego, Dallas, and Calgary.
Authors found that Toronto had the second-highest public transit ridership level in all of North America despite “the lowest subsidy rate of any North American city, no dedicated revenue sources, overly politicized administrative structures, and a bias toward suburban tunneled extensions over core network complexity.”
When examining fare structures, the report found that the TTC is the only transit agency of the seven that is required to cover two-thirds of its operating costs from fares. It also noted that the city is the only one with an annual fare pass option, a move which it says “disproportionately benefits” those with higher incomes.
The report states that Toronto lack predictable revenue and has the lowest overall subsidy, the lowest subsidy per rider, and the lowest overall revenue per rider among the seven cities.
“Almost every other city has a dedicated tax providing stable, predictable funding,” the report read.
Analyzing the different network designs, the report found that while GO Transit provides wide regional coverage, Toronto’s local rail network is “less complex, with less coverage than many cities.”
“Downtown core streetcar lines improve the network greatly, but at low resilience due to mixed-traffic street design. When contrasted with every other city in the study, it is clear Toronto’s heavy reliance on two very long rail lines is unusual,” the report said.
Comparing governance structures, the report discovered that Toronto’s transit governance differs from other North American cities in a few major ways.
“No other comparator city has a board fully appointed by the government with no open screening or approval process. More significantly, the City of Toronto has no representation on the Metrolinx Board whatsoever,” the report stated.
“No other comparator city has a fare card fully controlled by another level of government with no local oversight.”
The report authors suggested that Toronto needs a better funding model, a “less-politicized, more resilient governance structure,” more complexity in its rapid transit network, and less reliance on tunneled infrastructure.
The group also recommended reducing the cost and early commitment requirements for the monthly transit pass.
“Toronto and Queen’s Park are proposing change which will not resolve key vulnerabilities in Toronto’s transit: its low level of subsidy and lack of dedicated revenue,” Cameron MacLeod, executive director of CodeRedTO, said in a news release issued Tuesday.
“Nothing is more crucial than resolving decades of underfunding and poor network design. Tangible increases to service levels, improvements to passes and fares, and funding to build a more complete network all demand our immediate attention.”